Rohingya genocide case at world court awaits judgment
Nationalia 4-02-2026, 17:14 minorities, international, security
After three weeks of hearings, the genocide case brought against Burma over the mass atrocities committed against the Rohingya people has been submitted for judgment at the International Court of Justice (ICJ). The proceedings mark a significant moment in international justice: this is the first time a state not directly affected by the alleged crimes has taken another state to court over accusations of genocide. A ruling is not expected for at least six months.
The case was filed in 2019 by the small west African state of the Gambia, acting on behalf of the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation (OIC). The Gambian state argues that Burma has breached its obligations under the 1948 UN Genocide Convention to prevent and punish acts of genocide committed against the Rohingya in Rakhine state, where this people is largely concentrated. The application accuses the Burmese authorities of carrying out mass killings, rape and the destruction of entire Rohingya communities since October 2016.
In 2017, the Burmese military killed thousands of Rohingya and forced around three-quarters of a million people to flee to neighbouring Bangladesh. Those who remained in Burma were left facing persecution and dispossession. According to the Gambia’s submission, these events point to genocidal intent, as they indicate a desire to destroy the Rohingya as a people, in whole or in part. One of the Gambia’s lawyers, Paul Reichler, told the ICJ judges that the Burmese government had gone so far as to describe the Rohingya as an “impure and subhuman race”.
The judges also heard direct testimony, in closed session, from Rohingya survivors from several villages in Rakhine, who described the atrocities committed against their community. These abuses have been extensively documented by the United Nations, leading human rights organisations and a wide body of journalistic and academic research.
The ICJ rules on the responsibility of states, and its judgments are legally binding within the UN system, of which it is one of the six principal organs. The court, however, does not try individuals and has no independent means of enforcing its rulings, lacking coercive enforcement mechanisms of its own.
A conflict over territory
Successive Burmese governments have long regarded the presence of the Rohingya in Rakhine (also known as Arakan) as illegitimate, arguing that the state’s traditional indigenous population is the Rakhine, who are predominantly Buddhist. The Rohingya, who are Muslim, are descendants of migrants who arrived from what is now Bangladesh from the 19th century onwards, during the period of British colonial rule. The Rohingya, for their part, maintain that Rakhine has been their ancestral homeland for some two centuries and that they have no other now.
Beyond this identity-based narrative, which carries considerable weight in Burmese politics, there are other factors that help explain why successive governments—both military and civilian—have systematically marginalised the Rohingya. One is the fear of political fragmentation in a country made up of more than a hundred linguistic and cultural groups, at least a dozen of which see themselves as distinct nations and maintain armed organisations seeking far-reaching autonomy or even independence. Another is Rakhine’s strategic importance, including Burma’s maritime access to the Bay of Bengal and the energy corridor linking the port of Kyaukphyu to Kunming, in south-western China.
The Rohingya issue has also been repeatedly instrumentalised by successive governments to divert attention from other domestic crises and to foster cohesion among Buddhist Burmese by rallying them against an enemy portrayed as external. Finally, the exclusion of the Rohingya has enabled the authorities to dispossess them of land they have occupied for generations: having denied them citizenship—particularly under the 1982 citizenship law—, the state can declare their land abandoned or state-owned and redistribute it at will.
Burma has experienced intermittent armed conflict since 1948, when it gained independence from the UK. In the current phase, which began with the military coup of 2021, dozens of armed groups are contesting control of the country with the junta led by Min Aung Hlaing. Rakhine is one of the main theatres of this conflict. Much of the territory is controlled by the Arakan Army, a rebel group made up primarily of ethnic Rakhine, which several Rohingya organisations have accused of carrying out massacres against their community. In this context, Rohingya civilians are trapped between the junta’s armed forces and the Arakan Army and, in many cases, are at the mercy of both sides. While a Rohingya armed group has emerged in response to years of persecution, its military capacity remains very limited compared with those of the two dominant actors.
https://www.nationalia.info/new/11740/rohingya-genocide-case-at-world-court-awaits-judgment
Lundi 25 mai à 20 heures , se tiendra une réunion publique de la Ligue Savoisienne, avec la participation de Jean de Pingon.
read more..De gebruikersruimte LinkUp in Molenbeek ontvangt gemiddeld 6,5 gebruikers per dag sinds de opening. Dat staat volgens Brussels Parlementslid Mathias Vanden Borre in schril contrast met de hoge maatschappelijke en financiële kost van het project: “Voor een project met een dergelijke kostprijs zijn deze cijfers compleet buiten proportie.”
read more..Vlaams Parlementslid Tomas Roggeman wil de administratieve rompslomp in de transportsector stevig terugdringen. Met een voorstel van resolutie legt hij de vinger op de wonde: te veel regels, dubbele procedures en inefficiënte systemen wegen op bedrijven. “Transporteurs moeten vandaag niet alleen ondernemen, maar ook een halve administratie runnen. Dat is gewoon niet houdbaar voor onze concurrentiepositie.”
read more..La diputada Maria Àngels Planas assegura que l’equipament “necessita inversions extraordinàries davant el deteriorament de les seves instal·lacions”
read more..In un contesto segnato da crisi economiche, trasformazioni produttive e transizione ecologica, la specialità regionale rappresenta insieme una sfida e una leva di sviluppo. Come rafforzare l’autonomia per trasformare le crisi in nuove possibilità per il territorio? Se ne parlerà nel corso dell’incontro“Per una buona autonomia. La specialità regionale fra crisi economica e opportunità” in programma domani, venerdì 22 maggio, alle ore 16.30, a Udine, nella Torre di Santa Maria, in via Zanon 24, che vedrà la partecipazione dirappresentanti delle istituzioni, del mondo economico, cooperativo e culturaleper discutere insieme quale autonomia serva oggi alla nostra terra.
read more..Het Vlaams Belang reageert scherp op de uitspraken van minister Theo Francken(N-VA) over een mogelijke opname van Turkije in het Europese SAFE-mechanisme,en op zijn openlijke lof voor de Turkse defensie-industrie.“Dat Europese SAFE-instrument moet gezamenlijke investeringen in de Europese defensie-industrie financieren via leningen en samenwerkingsprojecten. Francken dreigt de deur open te zetten voor Europees belastinggeld richting de Turkse oorlogsindustrie”, stelt Kamerlid Annick Ponthier.“Concreetpleit hij voor Europees geld voor de Turkse defensie-industrie. Dat is compleet waanzinnig. We hebben het hier over een regime dat via militaire steun aan Azerbeidzjan medeverantwoordelijk was voor de etnische zuivering van meer dan 120.000 Armenen uit Nagorno-Karabach.”
read more..La diputada Irene Negre reclama “passar del diagnòstic a l’acció” amb més planificació, recursos i suport al sector forestal
read more..Bayern war einmal ein Königreich. Ein Staat mit eigenem Recht, eigener Währung, eigener Würde. Was ist davon geblieben? Ein Freistaat, der seinen Namen wie eine Erinnerung trägt – und seine Freiheit längst an Brüssel und Berlin abgegeben hat.
Dieses Manifest skizziert keine Utopie. Es beschreibt eine Ordnung, die auf einem einzigen Prinzip beruht: Der Mensch ist mündig. Er braucht keinen Staat, der für ihn denkt, spart, entscheidet und konsumiert. Er braucht Rechtssicherheit, Frieden und die Freiheit, sein Leben selbst zu gestalten.
Wer das naiv nennt, möge erklären, warum das Gegenteil, sieben Jahrzehnte Umverteilung, Regulierung und Planwirtschaft light, zu steigendem Wohlstand für alle geführt haben soll. Die Zahlen sprechen eine andere Sprache.
read more..Het Vlaams Belang is niet te spreken over de simpele mededeling van minister van Pensioenen Jan Jambon(N-VA), dat op mypension.be geen correcte ramingen meer zullen verschijnen over de mogelijke pensioendata tot eind 2027.“Dit zorgt ervoor dat mensen die na 1 januari 2027 met pensioen zouden gaan, geen enkel zicht meer hebben op de invloed van de nieuwe regels op hun pensioendatum”, stelt Vlaams Belang-Kamerlid Ellen Samyn.“Dit is ongezien, en onaanvaardbaar.”
read more..